VMD-L Mailing List

From: Mauricio C. Tripp (trippm_at_wabash.edu)
Date: Fri Jan 02 2004 - 14:27:06 CST

John,

I'm sorry, something definitely went wrong with charmm,
in the output file it skiped 69 output steps and there's
garbage in its place (as if the file was binary) and it
corresponds to where VMD finds the error format. After that
everything seems fine, so it is like if charmm did something
wrong while writing to files for a while and then came back
to normal... have you heard anything like that before?

sorry for the trouble...

Mauricio Carrillo Tripp