VMD-L Mailing List
From: Jérôme Hénin (jerome.henin_at_ibpc.fr)
Date: Mon Feb 18 2019 - 16:44:16 CST
- Next message: Axel Kohlmeyer: "Re: Topo tools error in dihedral guess"
- Previous message: Brian Radak: "Re: Difference in ParseFEP result with versions 1.9.2 and 2.1"
- In reply to: Amy Rice: "Difference in ParseFEP result with versions 1.9.2 and 2.1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Hi Amy,
thank you for your report. To help us figure this out, we'd need the
original fepout files. You can send them off-list if necessary.
Best,
Jerome
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 at 22:57, Amy Rice <arice3_at_hawk.iit.edu> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I noticed that using different versions of ParseFEP (1.9.2 vs 2.1) gives
> different free energy output when supplied with the same fepout files and
> temperature selection. With 1.9.2, the free energy change was calculated as
> -89.320 with a total error of 0.099. The same files in version 2.1 resulted
> in a free energy change of -98.704 and a total error of 0.071. Is this
> expected behavior? In both cases, I set the temperature to 310 K and
> selected to use the BAR-estimator method. Was there a change in how the
> calculation is performed between these two versions? It is a little
> disconcerting to have such a large difference between the two. I have
> attached the log file for both cases.
>
> Best,
> Amy
>
> --
> Amy Rice
> Ph.D. Candidate
> Physics Department
> Illinois Institute of Technology
>
- Next message: Axel Kohlmeyer: "Re: Topo tools error in dihedral guess"
- Previous message: Brian Radak: "Re: Difference in ParseFEP result with versions 1.9.2 and 2.1"
- In reply to: Amy Rice: "Difference in ParseFEP result with versions 1.9.2 and 2.1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]