VMD-L Mailing List
From: Ern Ong (Ern.Ong_at_student.adfa.edu.au)
Date: Wed Jul 26 2017 - 01:40:49 CDT
- Next message: Ashar Malik: "Re: mol pdbload failing"
- Previous message: Ashar Malik: "Re: mol pdbload failing"
- Next in thread: Mayne, Christopher G: "Re: ffTK: neutral pyruvate group and charged pyruvate group at beta-D-mannose"
- Reply: Mayne, Christopher G: "Re: ffTK: neutral pyruvate group and charged pyruvate group at beta-D-mannose"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Hi VMD users,
I have performed a series of optimization on a neutral pyruvate group + beta-D-mannose with Gaussian 09 program and ffTK plugin in VMD 1.9.3 (for WIN32 30Nov2016). Currently I wish to run simulations with a charged pyruvate group (COO-) + beta-D-mannose, I would like to know whether I should proceed to dihedral optimization? I have done the charge optimization with HF/6-31G theory for the charged pyruvate group (COO-) + beta-D-mannose. Not sure whether the results can be affected if I use the dihedral parameters that I got from the optimization of neutral pyruvate group + beta-D-mannose.
Thank you.
Best Regards,
Ernest Ong Ern Seang
PhD student
School of Engineering and Information Technology (SEIT)
University of New South Wales@ ADFA
NorthCott Drive, Campbell
ACT 2600, Australia.
- Next message: Ashar Malik: "Re: mol pdbload failing"
- Previous message: Ashar Malik: "Re: mol pdbload failing"
- Next in thread: Mayne, Christopher G: "Re: ffTK: neutral pyruvate group and charged pyruvate group at beta-D-mannose"
- Reply: Mayne, Christopher G: "Re: ffTK: neutral pyruvate group and charged pyruvate group at beta-D-mannose"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]