VMD-L Mailing List
From: Neeraj Agrawal (neer1980_at_gmail.com)
Date: Mon Jan 30 2017 - 11:29:19 CST
- Next message: Vermaas, Joshua: "Re: charmm36 vs charmm27/22 topology"
- Previous message: Stefano Guglielmo: "Re: colvars module"
- Next in thread: Vermaas, Joshua: "Re: charmm36 vs charmm27/22 topology"
- Reply: Vermaas, Joshua: "Re: charmm36 vs charmm27/22 topology"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Hello,
I am using the following set of commands to generate a .psf and .pdb file
of the solvated & ionized protein:
package require psfgen
topology top_all36_prot.rtf
....
....
....
package require solvate
topology top_all36_prot.rtf
topology toppar_water_ions.str
solvate prot.psf prot.pdb -t 12 -o solvate
package require autoionize
topology top_all36_prot.rtf
topology toppar_water_ions.str
autoionize -psf solvate.psf -pdb solvate.pdb -neutralize
However, in the output, ionized.psf, I see the following lines:
REMARKS topology 0.top_all36_prot.rtf
REMARKS topology 2.top_water_ions.rtf
REMARKS topology /usr/local/lib/vmd/plugins/noarch/tcl/solvate1.6/wat.top
REMARKS topology /usr/local/lib/vmd/plugins/noarch/tcl/readcharmmtop1.1/
top_all27_prot_lipid_na.inp
I assume that topology files between charmm27 and charmm36 are identical
for proteins, water and common ions (Na+, Cl-). If not, how do I disable
the charmm27 topology files from the solvate and autoionize packages?
Thanks,
Raj
- Next message: Vermaas, Joshua: "Re: charmm36 vs charmm27/22 topology"
- Previous message: Stefano Guglielmo: "Re: colvars module"
- Next in thread: Vermaas, Joshua: "Re: charmm36 vs charmm27/22 topology"
- Reply: Vermaas, Joshua: "Re: charmm36 vs charmm27/22 topology"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]