VMD-L Mailing List
From: Francesco Pietra (chiendarret_at_gmail.com)
Date: Thu Aug 20 2015 - 10:13:52 CDT
- Next message: Ajasja Ljubetič: "Re: Namd Plot Plugin"
- Previous message: Daniela Rivas: "Namd Plot Plugin"
- Next in thread: Mayne, Christopher G: "Re: ffTK and geometry optimization level"
- Reply: Mayne, Christopher G: "Re: ffTK and geometry optimization level"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Hello:
I posted recently about ffTK OPT MP2 problems, no answer, however it became
clear that the shared memory on a node (120GB) was not enough, and could
not be increased. On the other hand, Gaussian is threaded, so that I can't
exploit the enormous resources of the cluster.
Therefore, my question is, is OPT at MP2 really needed for getting a good
ff for ligands along ffTK in the realm of classical MD? OPT at SCF level,
followed by single-point MP2 is not enough? I understand that it depends on
what one is looking for, from simple docking to normal mode calculations,
so that my question covers all situations.
If SCF followed by single-point MP2 is not enough, the only alternative
that I can see is to break the ligand into pieces and carry out OPT/MP2 on
each piece, allowing for the approximations in reforming the whole ligand.
Thanks a lot for advice on strategy.
francesco pietra
- Next message: Ajasja Ljubetič: "Re: Namd Plot Plugin"
- Previous message: Daniela Rivas: "Namd Plot Plugin"
- Next in thread: Mayne, Christopher G: "Re: ffTK and geometry optimization level"
- Reply: Mayne, Christopher G: "Re: ffTK and geometry optimization level"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]