From: Olaf Lenz (olenz_at_icp.uni-stuttgart.de)
Date: Wed Oct 09 2013 - 02:37:07 CDT

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi again!

Thanks to all that suggested a solution. Apparently, there is no
solution using selections, but only what I would probably call
"workarounds" using Dynamic Bonds or "measure contacts".

However, I now wonder what the keyword "exwithin" is actually good for.
As it works now, I believe that you can always replace a selection of

  exwithin <d> of <sel>

by the equivalent selection of

  not <sel> and within <d> of <sel>

isn't that true?

Therefore, I would suggest to modify the semantics of the keyword
"exwithin" such that it selects an atom if it is within <d> of *another*
particle of the given selection. Or would it make sense to introduce
another keyword?

Olaf

- --
Dr. rer. nat. Olaf Lenz
Institut für Computerphysik, Allmandring 3, D-70569 Stuttgart
Phone: +49-711-685-63607
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlJVB6MACgkQtQ3riQ3oo/oP0ACfavPTAJ+n4jQ2jfyu2iY1Fs5Z
uKEAnj4z7VbG1E11VZR4lkaIq6P6wWFM
=VErC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----