VMD-L Mailing List
From: Ali, Rejwan (rejwan.ali_at_mssm.edu)
Date: Tue Jan 11 2011 - 14:51:18 CST
- Next message: Jacqueline Cawthray: "Re: Issues with Paratools and Gaussian"
- Previous message: Axel Kohlmeyer: "Re: namd energy plugin error: toplevel"
- Next in thread: Jacqueline Cawthray: "Re: Issues with Paratools and Gaussian"
- Reply: Jacqueline Cawthray: "Re: Issues with Paratools and Gaussian"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
In order to run a NAMD simulation of a receptor-ligand structure, I'm
having some issues with VMD Paratools and Gaussian.
The ligand structure is apperantly fine as viewed in VMD. However,
Gaussian complains about the input file as generated
by Paratools for the ligand for charge and multiplicity. Any clue to
how a Gaussian compatible input file can be written Paratools
so that after Gaussian Geomery optmization the log file can be imported
in Paratools to generate
parameters for the ligand ? We are interested to use Charmm force
field. Thank you.
Rejwan Ali
- Next message: Jacqueline Cawthray: "Re: Issues with Paratools and Gaussian"
- Previous message: Axel Kohlmeyer: "Re: namd energy plugin error: toplevel"
- Next in thread: Jacqueline Cawthray: "Re: Issues with Paratools and Gaussian"
- Reply: Jacqueline Cawthray: "Re: Issues with Paratools and Gaussian"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]