From: John Stone (johns_at_ks.uiuc.edu)
Date: Thu Jul 13 2006 - 10:42:38 CDT

Hi,
  The X1600 is the same chip in the Intel-based Mac I use as a compile
box, and while it's ok, it's not setting any speed records here either.
Granted, I'm using it on a Mac and a new version of MacOS X, so there's
bound to be room for driver improvement, but it's certainly not at all
comparable to a GeForce 6800 for example. One question for you is what
resolution you're running at, and what representations you're using.
You also didn't say what host processor you've got, which while only
a small part of the performance story does indeed matter for some
representations, particularly when play trajectories.

  John Stone
  vmd_at_ks.uiuc.edu

On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 07:39:59AM -0500, Yu Zhou wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I recently upgraded my video car to X1600 256M, the lastest product
> from ATI. However, the rendering speed of this video card is
> disappointingly low in VMD 1.8.4. The FPS was almost the same as that
> of a Dell 700M laptop for the same rendering task, while the latter
> was just using a shabby integrated graphic chip.
>
> I've installed the lastest drive for the X1600 and I'm running WINXP
> PRO SP2 on both two machines. The rendermode was the default OpenGL.
>
> Does anyone have anything to say about this?
>
> Thanks
>
> Yu Zhou
>
> WashU School of Medicine.

-- 
NIH Resource for Macromolecular Modeling and Bioinformatics
Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology
University of Illinois, 405 N. Mathews Ave, Urbana, IL 61801
Email: johns_at_ks.uiuc.edu                 Phone: 217-244-3349
  WWW: http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/~johns/      Fax: 217-244-6078