VMD-L Mailing List
From: Pawel Kedzierski (pawel.kedzierski_at_pwr.edu.pl)
Date: Fri Dec 12 2014 - 02:32:05 CST
- Next message: Pawel Kedzierski: "Small bugfix for NAMD Plot"
- Previous message: Dimitrov, Alex: "VMD/IMD problems on MacOS Yosemite"
- In reply to: Jun-Chieh Wang: "format I should use if I have different total number of atoms for each timesteps"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
W dniu 12.12.2014 o 02:47, Jun-Chieh Wang pisze:
> Among all the formats that the VMD support,
> which one should I choose if I have different total number
> of atoms for each timesteps ?
Dear Jun-Chieh,
This is as much a problem with file format as with VMD itself. It was a 
design decision (for various optimizations) that VMD does not support 
variable number of atoms over trajectory.
More details for example here:
http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/vmd/mailing_list/vmd-l/15881.html
That said, there is a possible workaround. You can calculate the peak 
number of atoms and create trajectory file of any format which has that 
surplus number of atoms constant at every frame. The atoms which should 
not be visible could be placed far away and/or not shown in the 
graphical representation.
You can select atoms by coordinate ranges, but you will need to update 
your selection at every frame.
A more involved solution would be to store the atom presence/visibility 
flag in the user fields of molecule data; I don't know if there is any 
file format from which VMD load used fields but one can fill them with 
scripting.
HTH,
Pawel
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
- Next message: Pawel Kedzierski: "Small bugfix for NAMD Plot"
- Previous message: Dimitrov, Alex: "VMD/IMD problems on MacOS Yosemite"
- In reply to: Jun-Chieh Wang: "format I should use if I have different total number of atoms for each timesteps"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]



