VMD-L Mailing List
From: Alexandre Suman de Araujo (asaraujo_at_ibilce.unesp.br)
Date: Thu Jun 13 2013 - 13:25:44 CDT
- Next message: John Stone: "Re: Problem with writepsf and CGenFF long atomtypes"
- Previous message: John Stone: "Re: Problem with writepsf and CGenFF long atomtypes"
- In reply to: John Stone: "Re: Problem with writepsf and CGenFF long atomtypes"
- Next in thread: John Stone: "Re: Problem with writepsf and CGenFF long atomtypes"
- Reply: John Stone: "Re: Problem with writepsf and CGenFF long atomtypes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Ops. Sorry.
1.9.2a14 version.
Cheers
-- Prof. Dr. Alexandre Suman de Araujo Departamento de Física Instituto de Biociências, Letras e Ciências Exatas - IBILCE Universidade Estadual Paulista e-mail: asaraujo_at_ibilce.unesp.br Phone: +55 (17) 3221-2566/3221-2240 On 13-06-2013 15:12, John Stone wrote: > Hi, > Which version of VMD are you using? > > Cheers, > John Stone > vmd_at_ks.uiuc.edu > > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 02:57:30PM -0300, Alexandre Suman de Araujo wrote: >> Hi all >> >> I have a .psf file generated with CGenFF topology file and "Automatic >> PSF Builder" plugin from VMD. The obtained .psf file has atoms with >> atomtype field with different sizes, ranging from 4 to 6 characters, as >> expected. I use this .psf and the obtained .pdb in NAMD simulations with >> CGenFF force field parameter files without problems. >> >> If I load this .psf and .pdb in VMD, open tkconsole, build a selection >> with all atoms and use the writepsf command I obtain a new .psf where >> all atomtype fields has the same size: 4 characters. The last characters >> are lost and this .psf is broken, since the atomtypes of this .psf do >> not match anymore with the ones in the CGenFF parameters file. >> >> Is this a known limitation in writepsf routine or there is some way I >> can use it (with some option) where it writes the atomtypes correctly? >> >> Best regards >> >> Alexandre Suman de Araujo
- Next message: John Stone: "Re: Problem with writepsf and CGenFF long atomtypes"
- Previous message: John Stone: "Re: Problem with writepsf and CGenFF long atomtypes"
- In reply to: John Stone: "Re: Problem with writepsf and CGenFF long atomtypes"
- Next in thread: John Stone: "Re: Problem with writepsf and CGenFF long atomtypes"
- Reply: John Stone: "Re: Problem with writepsf and CGenFF long atomtypes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]