VMD-L Mailing List
From: Axel Kohlmeyer (akohlmey_at_cmm.chem.upenn.edu)
Date: Tue Apr 22 2008 - 10:10:35 CDT
- Next message: cipitaua_at_gmail.com: "Re: bug in the g(r) evaluation?"
- Previous message: cipitaua_at_gmail.com: "bug in the g(r) evaluation?"
- In reply to: cipitaua_at_gmail.com: "bug in the g(r) evaluation?"
- Next in thread: cipitaua_at_gmail.com: "Re: bug in the g(r) evaluation?"
- Reply: cipitaua_at_gmail.com: "Re: bug in the g(r) evaluation?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, cipitaua_at_gmail.com wrote:
RC> Hello,
RC>
RC> I noticed that the first peak of a g(r) calculation with the vmd
RC> extension is slightly shifted respect to the expected value.
RC> Check this out with a very well ordered structure (for example
RC> graphene).
RC> In my case (cristalline silicon nanoclusters) it gives 2.70 instead of
RC> 2.43.
RC>
RC> Anyone confirms?
no. the peaks are exactly where they should be in my tests.
e.g. in rigid spc/e water it get the intramolecular peak at
exactly 1. angstrom.
please provide a coordinate/trajectory file that reproduces this,
explain how you obtained it, and with which code you get the
different g(r).
thanks,
axel.
RC>
RC> Thanx,
RC> Rob.
RC>
-- ======================================================================= Axel Kohlmeyer akohlmey_at_cmm.chem.upenn.edu http://www.cmm.upenn.edu Center for Molecular Modeling -- University of Pennsylvania Department of Chemistry, 231 S.34th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6323 tel: 1-215-898-1582, fax: 1-215-573-6233, office-tel: 1-215-898-5425 ======================================================================= If you make something idiot-proof, the universe creates a better idiot.
- Next message: cipitaua_at_gmail.com: "Re: bug in the g(r) evaluation?"
- Previous message: cipitaua_at_gmail.com: "bug in the g(r) evaluation?"
- In reply to: cipitaua_at_gmail.com: "bug in the g(r) evaluation?"
- Next in thread: cipitaua_at_gmail.com: "Re: bug in the g(r) evaluation?"
- Reply: cipitaua_at_gmail.com: "Re: bug in the g(r) evaluation?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]