VMD-L Mailing List
From: Jadzia Dax (jadziadax30_at_gmail.com)
Date: Wed Jan 03 2018 - 03:15:39 CST
- Next message: Jeffrey A Tibbitt: "Re: Problem drawing cylinders with a foreach loop - TCL syntax issue."
- Previous message: Vermaas, Joshua: "Re: question about point substitution A$B"*(BU"
- In reply to: Peter Freddolino: "Re: Improper terms in topology files processed by psfgen"
- Next in thread: Brian Radak: "Re: Improper terms in topology files processed by psfgen"
- Reply: Brian Radak: "Re: Improper terms in topology files processed by psfgen"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Dear Peter,
Thank you very much for your detailed answer, it has been extremely
insightful.
Since I guess one cannot change the behavior of psfgen in this regard the
most simple solution might to be write a script which corrects the atom
ordering in the psf-files to the default CHARMM format (central atom first)
so that programs like CP2K are able to use it along with the original
parameter files.
Best wishes,
Jadzia
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 4:31 PM, Peter Freddolino <petefred_at_umich.edu> wrote:
> Dear Jadzia,
> The reason that the order is reversible is that the way the improper
> potential is defined is based on the angle between the plane containing the
> first three atoms, and the plane containing the second three atoms (see
> Fig. 2 of http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcc.540040211/epdf).
> Those planes are not changed by reversing the order of the atom list (since
> the first three simply become the second three and vice versa).
>
> I am not sure, though, whether the implementation of the improper angle
> calculation used by all programs compatible with charmm-style psf files is
> the same. Some aspects of the charmm documentation strongly suggests that
> it requires the central atom to be listed first, and cp2k may be the same
> way. This may reflect different implementations of how to calculate the
> angles, or may be due to the valid concern that the reversibility does not
> hold except under special cases of the improper potential (it is only true
> for the harmonic potential with a phase angle of 0, but that condition is
> satisfied for all cases in the charmm parameter sets). For the harmonic
> version of the improper potential with that phase angle condition
> satisfied, I don't see why they should not ultimately work out the same
> under strict reversal of the atom list.
>
> Best,
> Peter
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 2:29 AM, Jadzia Dax <jadziadax30_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Everyone, and a happy new.
>>
>> On this
>> <http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Training/Tutorials/namd/namd-tutorial-unix-html/node24.html>
>> NAMD/VMD page here is written:
>>
>> *As with dihedrals, the order of atoms within an improper may be
>>> reversed. As shown below, impropers are specified by the IMPR statement
>>> followed by sets of four atoms, with the central atom to which the other
>>> three are bonded typically listed first.*
>>
>>
>> Why can the direction be reversed with impropers? As far as I can see
>> this would change the central atom. The three orbital atoms should be
>> exchangable of course, but this would rather be any permutation of the last
>> three atoms.
>>
>> The reason why I am concerned with this topic is that I have rtf/prm
>> files for a ligand prepared with CGenFF. The rtf file has one Improper. And
>> when I create the psf file with VMD/psfgen then the psf file has the atoms
>> in reversed order than in the rtf-file. But the prm-file still has the
>> original order. Thus my simulations (not with NAMD but with CP2K) fail
>> immediately because the it cannot find the parameters for this improper.
>>
>> Any help or comment is appreciated.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>> Jadzia
>>
>
>
- Next message: Jeffrey A Tibbitt: "Re: Problem drawing cylinders with a foreach loop - TCL syntax issue."
- Previous message: Vermaas, Joshua: "Re: question about point substitution A$B"*(BU"
- In reply to: Peter Freddolino: "Re: Improper terms in topology files processed by psfgen"
- Next in thread: Brian Radak: "Re: Improper terms in topology files processed by psfgen"
- Reply: Brian Radak: "Re: Improper terms in topology files processed by psfgen"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]