VMD-L Mailing List
From: Francesco Pietra (chiendarret_at_gmail.com)
Date: Wed Jul 17 2013 - 12:48:36 CDT
- Next message: Mayne, Christopher G: "Re: FFTK and CGenFF"
- Previous message: John Stone: "Re: Combine volmap occupancy maps"
- In reply to: Francesco Pietra: "FFTK and CGenFF"
- Next in thread: Mayne, Christopher G: "Re: FFTK and CGenFF"
- Reply: Mayne, Christopher G: "Re: FFTK and CGenFF"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
In this connection I also wonder how molefacture treats pyrrole,
either quasi-aromatic or localized C=C, in order that the total charge
is zero.
Thanks
francesco pietra
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Francesco Pietra <chiendarret_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 5:14 PM
Subject: vmd-l: FFTK and CGenFF
To: vmd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu
Hello:
I wonder whether CGenFF can be of any help to set up parameters for a
new ligand of a protein with FFTK for NAMD.
As there are atom types not comprised directly in CHARMM FF v 27, I
used CGenFF before going to MOLEFACTURE, however getting atom types
for CHARMM ff version 36.
I know there is a flag for NAMD to use CHARMM mode dealing with L-J,
however, has v27 been combined with v36? Can them be used for the same
run?
thanks
francesco pietra
- Next message: Mayne, Christopher G: "Re: FFTK and CGenFF"
- Previous message: John Stone: "Re: Combine volmap occupancy maps"
- In reply to: Francesco Pietra: "FFTK and CGenFF"
- Next in thread: Mayne, Christopher G: "Re: FFTK and CGenFF"
- Reply: Mayne, Christopher G: "Re: FFTK and CGenFF"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]