VMD-L Mailing List
From: Mayne, Christopher G (cmayne2_at_illinois.edu)
Date: Thu Sep 13 2012 - 19:58:48 CDT
- Next message: luoyuan Q: "problem showing lammps dump files"
 - Previous message: ehsan zahedinejad: "Duplicate option in fftk"
 - In reply to: ehsan zahedinejad: "Duplicate option in fftk"
 - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
 
As far as I know, most MD engines will use multiple periodicities (i.e. n=1 & n=3 from your data) additively in the energy evaluation; which is why we put that option in ffTK.  If you look through the standard CHARMM distribution, it is a fairly common way of fitting complex dihedral profiles, but is not without its drawbacks and limitations.  For a good discussion, see:
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~kenno/cgenff/faq.html#multi
Chris
On Sep 13, 2012, at 6:53 PM, ehsan zahedinejad wrote:
> Dear VMD users,
> 
> After successfully generating ff parameters using VMD fftk I have a question about duplicate option in fftk. I used this option to get the best dihedral fit. After extracting ff from dihedral I noticed there are two set of dihedrals for one of my dihedral parameter (B/C I duplicated this set during the process of opt- torsions). For example I have the following duplicated form in my ff output files:
> 
> C6   C7  C8  O5   0.6670   1  0.00   
> C6   C7  C8  O5   0.7860   3  0.00   
> 
> My question is which one of these dihedral will be used by MD engine. Or should I remove one of them from my final ff file? If so which one has to be removed?
> 
> any suggestions are welcome.
>  
> Ehsan.
> 
- Next message: luoyuan Q: "problem showing lammps dump files"
 - Previous message: ehsan zahedinejad: "Duplicate option in fftk"
 - In reply to: ehsan zahedinejad: "Duplicate option in fftk"
 - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
 



