From: Maxim Belkin (mbelkin_at_ks.uiuc.edu)
Date: Fri Mar 11 2016 - 14:34:35 CST
It is better to set cellbasisvector[1,2] to exact values.
Because you are not using MSM (and you can’t use PME with non-periodic systems), interactions between atoms in the system aren’t right (they are cut off at 12 AA). You should look into MSM first, it should not be that difficult.
Now, the fact that your simulation crash ~150,000 steps might indicate a problem that emerges due to multiple time-stepping. Try: "stepspercycle 2".
Finally, what do you expect to get from an NPT simulation with vacuum along z? How do you expect langevinPiston to work in this situation?
> On Mar 10, 2016, at 20:01, Olya Kravchenko <ovkrav_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thank you! I will study MSM method.
>
> I have changed the size of cell vectors back to 62, that is the actual
> size rounded up, and I commented out cellBasisVector3. I ran a number
> of simulations today and I keep seeing the same error when I increase
> the number of timesteps. The margin size does seem to make the job run
> longer, at least I don't see any other correlation. My last run quit
> near 150 000 timesteps (I set it up for 500K timesteps).
>
> Apart from that, I see in vmd that my simulation box actually becomes
> longer in Z-direction, it is a cube in the beginning and then the
> proportion changes. I am not sure how to interpret it, but it looks
> like the size in z does not hold, certainly no hard wall. I wonder if
> there is a way to set up the hard wall in a simple way?
>
> Olga
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Maxim Belkin <mbelkin_at_ks.uiuc.edu> wrote:
>> Olya,
>>
>> If your system size is 60A in x and y, you should use vectors of length 60 as your "cellbasisvector[1,2]". You are currently using 70, which means you have vacuum in x and y directions and this is not what you want. To simulate a system that is non-periodic along Z with NAMD you have to use Multi-level summation method (look for MSM option in NAMD User’s Guide). I believe you have to remove "cellbasisvector3" instead of specifying 0 0 0 but I’m not 100% positive on that.
>>
>> Maxim
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 10, 2016, at 11:21, Olya Kravchenko <ovkrav_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> My system consists of 200 argon atoms in a box, PBC in X and Y, I
>>> would like hard wall in Z and my goal is to measure
>>> density/concentration. So I think that NPT is reasonable in my case,
>>> is that correct?
>>>
>>> I commented out PME, because I read that it will speed up
>>> calculations, also because, if I understand it correctly, it requires
>>> all three cell basis vectors to be defined.
>>>
>>> linaccel is commented because I defined my own force in a separate
>>> file for the force.
>>>
>>> Here is my configuration file:
>>>
>>> #############################################################
>>> ## JOB DESCRIPTION ##
>>> #############################################################
>>>
>>> # Equilibration of argon atoms with PBC in XY direction
>>>
>>> #############################################################
>>> ## ADJUSTABLE PARAMETERS ##
>>> #############################################################
>>>
>>> structure ar.psf
>>> coordinates ar.pdb
>>>
>>> set temperature 310
>>> set outputname ar_force_out
>>>
>>> firsttimestep 0
>>>
>>>
>>> #############################################################
>>> ## SIMULATION PARAMETERS ##
>>> #############################################################
>>>
>>> # Input
>>> paraTypeCharmm on
>>> parameters My_parameters.rtf
>>> temperature $temperature
>>>
>>>
>>> # Force-Field Parameters
>>> exclude scaled1-4
>>> 1-4scaling 1.0
>>> cutoff 12.0
>>> switching on
>>> switchdist 10.0
>>> pairlistdist 14.0
>>>
>>>
>>> # Integrator Parameters
>>> timestep 2.0 ;# 2fs/step
>>> rigidBonds all ;# needed for 2fs steps
>>> nonbondedFreq 1
>>> fullElectFrequency 2
>>> stepspercycle 10
>>>
>>>
>>> # Constant Temperature Control
>>> langevin on ;# do langevin dynamics
>>> langevinDamping 1 ;# damping coefficient (gamma) of 1/ps
>>> langevinTemp $temperature
>>> langevinHydrogen off ;# don't couple langevin bath to hydrogens
>>>
>>>
>>> # Periodic Boundary Conditions
>>> cellBasisVector1 62.0 0. 0.0
>>> cellBasisVector2 0.0 62.0 0.0
>>> cellBasisVector3 0.0 0 0.0
>>> cellOrigin 30.0 30.0 32.5
>>>
>>> wrapAll on
>>>
>>> margin 10
>>>
>>> # PME (for full-system periodic electrostatics)
>>> #PME yes
>>> #PMEGridSpacing 1.0
>>>
>>>
>>> # Constant Pressure Control (variable volume)
>>> useGroupPressure yes ;# needed for rigidBonds
>>> useFlexibleCell no
>>> useConstantArea no
>>>
>>> langevinPiston on
>>> langevinPistonTarget 1.01325 ;# in bar -> 1 atm
>>> langevinPistonPeriod 100.0
>>> langevinPistonDecay 50.0
>>> langevinPistonTemp $temperature
>>>
>>> ##################
>>> ###DEFINE FORCES##
>>> ##################
>>>
>>> tclForces on
>>> tclForcesScript my_force.tcl
>>> #set linaccel "30 0 0"
>>>
>>> # Output
>>> outputName $outputname
>>>
>>> restartfreq 500 ;# 500steps = every 1ps
>>> dcdfreq 250
>>> xstFreq 250
>>> outputEnergies 100
>>> outputPressure 100
>>>
>>>
>>> # Minimization
>>> minimize 100
>>> reinitvels $temperature
>>>
>>> run 100000
>>>
>>> Thanks!!
>>>
>>> Olga
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:05 AM, Norman Geist
>>> <norman.geist_at_uni-greifswald.de> wrote:
>>>> We need to see your full input script, since it looks you're doing npt?
>>>>
>>>> Norman Geist
>>>>
>>>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>>>> Von: owner-namd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu [mailto:owner-namd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu] Im
>>>>> Auftrag von Olya Kravchenko
>>>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. März 2016 04:23
>>>>> An: NAMD <namd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu>
>>>>> Betreff: namd-l: periodic boundary condition in XY, hard wall in Z - errors
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to apply periodic boundary conditions only in X and Y
>>>>> directions. In my config file I used the following entry:
>>>>>
>>>>> # Periodic Boundary Conditions
>>>>> cellBasisVector1 70.0 0. 0.0
>>>>> cellBasisVector2 0.0 70.0 0.0
>>>>> cellBasisVector3 0.0 0 0.0
>>>>> cellOrigin 30.0 30.0 32.5
>>>>>
>>>>> wrapAll on
>>>>> margin 5
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> When I submit the job it runs for a while until I see the following error:
>>>>>
>>>>> WRITING COORDINATES TO DCD FILE ar_force_out.dcd AT STEP 20750
>>>>> FATAL ERROR: Periodic cell has become too small for original patch grid!
>>>>> Possible solutions are to restart from a recent checkpoint,
>>>>> increase margin, or disable useFlexibleCell for liquid simulation.
>>>>>
>>>>> How can I address this error? Is this the right way to set up PBC in 2
>>>>> dimensions?
>>>>>
>>>>> My simulation cell is actually around (~61 ~61 ~62), as measured by
>>>>> minmax. I played with numbers and noticed that my simulation runs
>>>>> longer if I increase both the margin and cell basis vectors.
>>>>>
>>>>> I saw some of the older threads in the archives where the margin was
>>>>> discussed but it's not clear how large should it be. If I want to run
>>>>> my simulation for 500 000 steps, what margin should I set up?
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, when choosing cell basis vector, how much bigger should it be
>>>>> than what is measured by "measure minmax"?
>>>>
>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Tue Dec 27 2016 - 23:21:52 CST