From: dbaogen (dbaogen_at_gmail.com)
Date: Sat Nov 24 2012 - 21:50:05 CST
Dear Dr. Chipot,
Thank you for your detailed instructions! I make a mistake of description in the previous email. In fact, I used the fep.tcl to carry out FEP calculation and obtained the free energy change from 0 to 1 and confused energy and free energy. Now I understand this after your instructions. Thanks!
In addition, I have some problems to reproduce the results shown in Tutorial FEP (http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Training/Tutorials/#namd ). For example, charging of a naked Lennard-Jones particle into a sodium ion, I extracted the values of free energy change using deltaA.awk script for forward and backward fepout download from http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Training/Tutorials/#namd . And free energy profile obtained is not the same as the Figure 5 in Tutorial-FEP.pdf file. In Figure 5, forward and backward parts are overlapped. In fact, the values of free energy change for the forward and backward have a sign difference. How could I obtain the same free-energy change file as Figure 5. The same condition occurred in the "Binding of a potassium ion to 18-crown-6" part. Using the downloaded *.fepout files, I could not reproduce the same free energy profile as the Figure 10. Whether do some tricky techniques to deal with the free energy change data? Thank you in advance!
发件人： Chris Chipot
发送时间： 2012-11-24 23:54
主题： Re: namd-l: question about relative binding free energy calculation method using FEP
I want to calculate the relative free energy between RAN polymerase and ATP or GTP using FEP method implemented in NAMD software. Firstly, the mutation of ATP to GTP in water solution is calculated. After 100 ps equilibrium of the system, forward and backward FEP analysis are carried out. The energy values are close when lambda value is larger than 0.5. But there exists deviation when lambda value is less than 0.5. what will result in this condition?
Who knows! What can be predicted, however, from the values assigned
to alchVdwLambdaEnd and alchElecLambdaStart is a discontinuity
of ∆G at λ = 0.5, when only the van der Waals term of the intermolecular interactions subsist for the perturbed portion of your system. This aspect
of free-energy calculations is actually discussed at length not only in the
user's guide, but also in the dedicated FEP tutorials.
The FEP parameter setting is as follow:
Another question is how to obtain the energy value when lambda is equal to 0 or 1 corresponding to forward or backward analysis?
Your question is not particularly clear. There seems to be a confusion
between energy and free energy. Since you are running FEP calculations,
what you are measuring is not a free-energy change at λ, but a free-energy
change between λ and λ + δλ. Conventionally, in a forward free-energy
calculation, ∆G is 0 at λ = 0. Likewise, in a backward transformation,
∆G is 0 at λ = 1.
If the initial value of lambda is 0, and increment is 0.05. when the calculation is completed, the output *.fepout file will give the energy value from 0.5 to 1.
No. Unlike the starting point of your simulation is set to be 0.5 and its endpoint
to be 1. I can assure you that if you use fep.tcl and write
runFEP 0.0 1.0 0.05 $nSteps
your output file will, indeed, contain all the free-energy changes from 0 to 1,
i.e., 0 to 0.05, 0.05 to 0.1, etc... 0.95 to 1.
Does the energy value correspond to lambda(0) state when I set the FEP parameters alchLambda (0 ) and alchLambda2 (0) simultaneously?
If you set concomitantly alchLambda and alchLambda2 to 0, you will
compute a free-energy change between λ = 0 and λ = 0 -- and find out
that ∆G is 0. Computer time well spent.
Would you like to help me with the problems?
If you do not find a nil ∆G between λ = 0 and λ = 0, please, write to us.
Thank you for your great help!
Chris Chipot, Ph.D.
Theoretical and Computational Biophysics Group
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
405 North Mathews Phone: (217) 244-5711
Urbana, Illinois 61801 Fax: (217) 244-6078
The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Mon Dec 31 2012 - 23:22:17 CST