From: Rajan Vatassery (rajan_at_umn.edu)
Date: Mon Sep 03 2012 - 15:15:28 CDT
looks like we agree that it would be easy to do.
On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 22:13 +0200, Axel Kohlmeyer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Rajan Vatassery <rajan_at_umn.edu> wrote:
> > On a related note, I think VMD could add an error message in cases
> VMD is a visualizer there doesn't care much what kind of data you feed it.
> > where atoms are superimposed. While it wouldn't be widely useful, it
> > would be easy enough to implement that it would be worthwhile
> > expenditure of time.
> you can easily write such a check with a few lines of VMD script code.
> (loop over all atoms, create a selection with a reasonably short cutoff
> around the current atom index, count the atoms in the selection, if it
> more than 1 throw a warning, delete the selection).
> > rajan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Mon Dec 31 2012 - 23:22:01 CST