From: Paulo Cesar Telles de Souza (paulocts_at_gmail.com)
Date: Tue Feb 07 2012 - 11:53:47 CST
Hello everyone
Thank you for answers. Sorry for being slow to answer, but I spent a
few days thinking about the considerations that you did. The problem
that occurred to me is that alignment problems may occur if the
conformation differences are great. With a bad alignment, the average
force at a given RMSD can be compromised. If I have to use the same
atoms in the current version of NAMD, then I will include a few others
that do not have large conformational differences in relation to the
references. So it is possible to prevent alignment problems to which I
refer.
What do you think about this option?
Best,
Paulo
Paulo
2012/2/2 Jérôme Hénin <jhenin_at_ifr88.cnrs-mrs.fr>
> I concur with Chris. In some special cases I see why you might want to
> align some atoms and measure deviation on others, but not in the case
> you described.
>
> Best,
> Jerome
>
> On 2 February 2012 20:54, Chris Harrison <charris5_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > The are the same. It is not clear to me why you'd want to calc the RMSD
> of
> > a set of atoms which do not correspond to the subset used for alignment--f46d043c7dbe0247ee04b86376da--
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Mon Dec 31 2012 - 23:21:11 CST