Is there any difference between SMD and tclForces?

From: Jun Zhang (coolrainbow_at_yahoo.cn)
Date: Wed May 18 2011 - 20:29:07 CDT

• Next message: Axel Kohlmeyer: "Re: Is there any difference between SMD and tclForces?"
• Previous message: Jim Phillips: "Re: NAMD 2.7/2.8b2 stuck - [0] processControlPoints() haveControlPointChangeCallback=0 frameworkShouldAdvancePhase=0"
• Next in thread: Axel Kohlmeyer: "Re: Is there any difference between SMD and tclForces?"
• Reply: Axel Kohlmeyer: "Re: Is there any difference between SMD and tclForces?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi everyone:

   I am going to perform some SMD simulations but I have two choices: one by direct SMD configuration in NAMD or manually configured in a script by tclForces. Although the latter is more flexible, I wonder if the tcl script in every time step will slow down (obviously?) the total speed of MD since my system is quite large? Maybe direct SMD will be faster since it is implemented in C++? Any suggestions will be appreciated.

Jun Zhang
Nankai University
coolrainbow_at_yahoo.cn

• Next message: Axel Kohlmeyer: "Re: Is there any difference between SMD and tclForces?"
• Previous message: Jim Phillips: "Re: NAMD 2.7/2.8b2 stuck - [0] processControlPoints() haveControlPointChangeCallback=0 frameworkShouldAdvancePhase=0"
• Next in thread: Axel Kohlmeyer: "Re: Is there any difference between SMD and tclForces?"
• Reply: Axel Kohlmeyer: "Re: Is there any difference between SMD and tclForces?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Mon Dec 31 2012 - 23:20:17 CST