From: Ajasja Ljubetič (ajasja.ljubetic_at_gmail.com)
Date: Mon Mar 28 2011 - 09:30:28 CDT
Hi Bjoern,
>
> I would have taken a detour if you wouldn't have mentioned ABF! Thanks a
> lot
> for this comment!
>
>
You're welcome. Actually something similar happened to me when I was
starting out with NAMD. After doing the basic tutorials I browsed through
the manual, but I always skipped the colvars part, because it seem too
complicated:)
So after playing around with NAMD CVS, GBIS, COLVARS, and ABF I could verify
> that my setup works (I just calculated the free energy profile for ethane
> and
> I could reproduce a nice sine like profile for -180 to 180 degree rotation
> with a peak at around 2,7kcal for the eclipsed conformation). Still I have
> some questions how ABF works:
>
> Why can't I reproduce the above when choosing "lowerBoundary 0" and
> "upperBoundary 360" instead of -180 and 180?
>
Have you tried setting.
*wrapAround 180*
**
I don't know about the height difference, it could be due to sampling? How
does the trajectory look in VMD?
> If a bin is poorly sampled, one can interpret this as a highly unfavored
> conformation or the applied force was not sufficient to push the structure
> into this conformation and the process might not be reversible. Is this
> assumption right (assuming that the sampling time was sufficient)?
>
> Yes, although I'm not sure about the reversibility of the process.
> Is there a built-in keyword which outputs Xi as a function of time
> or can I make NAMD do so in some way.
>
If you want the PMF as a function of time check out
*historyFreq*
*
http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/namd/2.8b1/ug/node56.html#SECTION000133100000000000000
*
*
*
*
If you are interested in the position of the colvar as a function of time,
then you can just plot the colvar trajectory file.
http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/namd/2.8b1/ug/node54.html#SECTION000131300000000000000
Best regards,
Ajasja
*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Mon Dec 31 2012 - 23:20:00 CST