From: Pengcheng Yin (yin.p_at_husky.neu.edu)
Date: Fri Mar 12 2010 - 09:03:09 CST
Hi Axel and Jerome,
Thank you for the response! I will try to update the version first.
I do apologize for that improper address... I did not think too much before
I wrote that down... i just started using Namd and please believe me there
is no disrespect at all..
Thanks again and wish you all have a great weekend!
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 5:56 AM, Axel Kohlmeyer <akohlmey_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> hi jerome,
> you are - as usual - correct. upon second reading my response
> came over much more harsh and much less tongue-in-cheek
> than it was intended to be. the "NAMD genius" address was far
> too tempting. i guess being named the "official mail list bad cop"
> by the LAMMPS folks is getting to my head. ;-)
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Jérôme Hénin <jhenin_at_ifr88.cnrs-mrs.fr>
> > Hi everyone,
> >> you are trying to run an obsolete beta version.
> >> this is an incredibly pointless undertaking.
> >> have you tried a proper release version or
> >> if you must use a beta version at least the latest one?
> > In Pengcheng's defense, I must say the NAMD community doesn't have
> > much of a tradition of differentiating between beta and stable
> > versions. NAMD 2.5b1 was just _the_ current release (the one everybody
> > used) for ages. That said, it is really obsolete now.
> > Cheers,
> > Jerome
> Dr. Axel Kohlmeyer akohlmey_at_gmail.com
> Institute for Computational Molecular Science
> Temple University, Philadelphia PA, USA.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Feb 29 2012 - 15:55:33 CST