From: Chris Harrison (char_at_ks.uiuc.edu)
Date: Sat Jul 11 2009 - 19:38:30 CDT
It means you have a high-energy vdW interactions, likely a "near clash" of
two different atoms in multiple sites through your system. Minimization, if
ran long enough, should clean these up in most reasonable cases and permit
you to proceed to equilibrate your system with MD. You should continue
minimizing until your energies are converged, exhibiting little to no net
change over many steps; only fluctuations about a mean value.
Chris
-- Chris Harrison, Ph.D. Theoretical and Computational Biophysics Group NIH Resource for Macromolecular Modeling and Bioinformatics Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology University of Illinois, 405 N. Mathews Ave., Urbana, IL 61801 char_at_ks.uiuc.edu Voice: 217-244-1733 http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/~char <http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/%7Echar> Fax: 217-244-6078 On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Uma Mageshwari <mageshwariuma6_at_gmail.com>wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to do a simulation using Namd. During minimisation i am > getting 99999999.9999 as vander waals energy at first step. But later its > decreasing....... > > 1.Does it mean the error in peridic boundary > condition? > > 2. Could it affect the result? > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Feb 29 2012 - 15:53:01 CST