From: Guanglei Cui (amber.mail.archive_at_gmail.com)
Date: Tue May 19 2009 - 08:56:00 CDT
Thanks for the reply. I have not tried to compile Charm++ with any MPI
implementations, and been using the net- option. Is there any
advantage of using MPI (just any MPI)vs. using the net- option?
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:31 AM, Lev Lafayette <lev_at_vpac.org> wrote:
> Hi Guanglei,
> Although I am no NAMD expert, I would suggest compiling from source and creating an application. As a binary you probably won't be picking up the performance benefits, which should be determined by whatever you're using as message parsing interface (OpenMPI?). Then you should seem some real gains.
> All the best,
> Lev Lafayette (03) 9925 4909, Systems Administrator, Victorian Partnership for Advanced Computing
> "If you are sending a reply to a message or a posting be sure you summarize the original at the top of the message, or include just enough text of the original to give a context. This will make sure readers understand when they start to read your response."
> RFC 1855
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Feb 29 2012 - 15:52:49 CST