From: Richard Wood (rwoodphd_at_yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Oct 11 2007 - 20:03:22 CDT
Hi all,
It's funny how some of us have never heard of some of these "MD experts".
Richard
Richard L. Wood, Ph. D.
University of Minnesota
Dept. of Medicinal Chemistry,
College of Pharmacy
717 Delaware St. SE
Minneapolis, MN
55414-2959
rwoodphd_at_yahoo.com
----- Original Message ----
From: Philip Peartree <P.Peartree_at_postgrad.manchester.ac.uk>
To: Richard Law <rlaw_at_hanyou.llnl.gov>
Cc: "namd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu" <namd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu>
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 7:09:13 PM
Subject: Re: namd-l: Large Benchmarks
No, but I did share a lab with Richard until last week! I didn't know
he used
NAMD much. I will try with a large water box and see where I get...
Quoting Richard Law <rlaw_at_hanyou.llnl.gov>:
>
> It would actully be a better benchmark than having a protein or/and
> membrane for which the density will vary significantly depending on
> the system when what you want to be able measure is a scalable system
> for different numbers of atoms per processor. Different settings for
> your cut-offs and electrostatics will alter scaling a lot.
>
> Btw - Richard Henchman is at Manchester - he is an expert on these
> kinds of thing. Have you spoke to him?
>
> Rich.
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Tonight's top picks. What will you watch tonight? Preview the hottest shows on Yahoo! TV.
http://tv.yahoo.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Feb 29 2012 - 15:45:22 CST