From: Gengbin Zheng (gzheng_at_ks.uiuc.edu)
Date: Wed May 11 2005 - 22:21:36 CDT
The line in the printout is not very clear;  It really depends on how 
you break the records in the line: I added "^"s to break the records.
Iface   MTU Met   RX-OK RX-ERR RX-DRP RX-OVR   TX-OK TX-ERR TX-DRP TX-OVR          Flg
eth0   1500   0^23182578986 637615860      0      0^23839814024      1      0      0 BMRU
eth1   1500   0       0      0      0      0       0      0      0      0          BMU
lo    16436   0^2271084541      0      0      0^2271084541      0      0            0 LRU
so it looks like a lot of receive packet error but no dropped packets, 
also there is almost no send packet error. If this is parity error at 
receive time,  it could mean a bad ethernet card or something.
Does it also happen to other applications?
Gengbin
Rene Salmon wrote:
>Hi List,
>
>We are having some strange network problems with CHARM/NAMD on an AMD64
>clustermatic 5 cluster. 
>
>On nodes that are not running NAMD jobs we this for the network stats
>
>  
>
>># bpsh 10 netstat -i
>>    
>>
>Kernel Interface table
>Iface   MTU Met   RX-OK RX-ERR RX-DRP RX-OVR   TX-OK TX-ERR TX-DRP TX-OVR
>Flg
>eth0   1500   0221380022      0      0      0238341193      0      0      0
>BMRU
>eth1   1500   0       0      0      0      0       0      0      0      0
>BMU
>lo    16436   0      18      0      0      0      18      0      0      0
>LRU
>
>
>
>
>
>As you can see no error or dropped packets.  But on nodes that are running
>NAMD Jobs we get this:
>
>  
>
>># bpsh 4 netstat -i
>>    
>>
>Kernel Interface table
>Iface   MTU Met   RX-OK RX-ERR RX-DRP RX-OVR   TX-OK TX-ERR TX-DRP TX-OVR
>Flg
>eth0   1500   023182578986 637615860      0      023839814024      1      0
>0 BMRU
>eth1   1500   0       0      0      0      0       0      0      0      0
>BMU
>lo    16436   02271084541      0      0      02271084541      0      0
>0 LRU
>
>
>
>Which shows lots of error and dropped packets.  Is this normal?  Some how
>this is slowing the network down and causing NFS problems.
>
>Any ideas?
>
>Thank you 
>Rene
>  
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Feb 29 2012 - 15:39:27 CST