From: nordgren_at_sas.upenn.edu
Date: Mon Dec 13 2004 - 18:30:51 CST
Hello all:
Brian, you always have sage advice to share on this list... but I think in
this case I may disagree with your brief analysis.  The thing is, Charles'
total system energy is negative and quite large (compared to the VdW
component), due to the (large, negative) electrostatic interactions.  In
such a situation, a net positive VdW energy (especially when it is still
smaller than the bonded energy components, i.e.,
bonds/angles/torsions)doesn't really surprise me.  If the initial conditions
had close-contacts that were not removed by minimization, then the system
would either fall apart early on, or (as appears to be the case here) they
would be removed over the course of 2 million steps of dynamics.  (Of
course, it's *possible* that some pathological topology exists somewhere in
the system, allowing some high-energy close-contacts to be trapped and
persist for nanoseconds... I guess it couldn't hurt to check for that.)
Carlos, thanks for those links -- the second one is a particularly good
read.  All I would add is a reminder that the "PRESSURE" and "GPRESSURE"
columns are not particularly interesting, since they represent instantaneous
values; moreover, if one is using multiple timestepping (evaluating the
nonbonded forces only, say, every other timestep) then you can get a *very*
misleading idea of what is going on, because the pressure values you see
reported are only for timesteps when the nonbonded forces aren't included. 
What one needs to look at, instead, is the average pressure (i.e., PRESSAVG
or GPRESSAVG).
So Charles, given the above, it looks like your system is sitting in a
situation of slight under-pressure (about -150 bars or so), which for an NVT
liquid simulation is also not so surprising -- this would result from a
system volume that is just ever so slightly too large (again, see Carlos'
second link).
As for whether/how the results of an MD simulation are affected by running
in
an under-pressure NVT ensemble, this is a more detailed question, that
requires consulting the journal literature....
Hope this is helpful for now!
-Erik
C. Erik Nordgren, Ph.D.
Department of Chemistry
University of Pennsylvania
Quoting Brian Bennion <brian_at_youkai.llnl.gov>:
> 
> hi charles,
> 
> it would appear that the system is NOT equilibrated.  A brief look at
> your
> VDW energies suggests that there is still some room to minimize poor
> interations.  That value should not be positive.
> Have you minimized by component?  what were the gradient values after
> minimization of the complete system?
> 
> Regards
> Brian
Quoting "carlos n. a." <carlosjavierna_at_hotmail.com>:
> Hi. maybe you can read this
> 
> http://amber.scripps.edu/Questions/mail/32.html
> http://amber.scripps.edu/Questions/pressure.html
>  On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Charles Danko wrote:
Dear community,
Pasted below are a sample of my output energies.  I am concerned by
the pressure readings.  I have read in a previous thread that it is
normal for the pressure to jump around a lot (I am using an NVT
ensemble), but these values seem rather excessive to me, since I used
a water and lipid box which (I believe) was equilibarated to 1bar. 
Would anyone give me feedback on whether they think that these
pressures negatively affect my simulation?
Thanks in advance!!
Best wishes,
Charles
WRITING COORDINATES TO DCD FILE AT STEP 2149000
ETITLE:      TS           BOND          ANGLE          DIHED          IMPRP
          ELECT            VDW       BOUNDARY           MISC        KINETIC
          TOTAL           TEMP         TOTAL2         TOTAL3        TEMPAVG
       PRESSURE      GPRESSURE         VOLUME       PRESSAVG      GPRESSAVG
WRITING COORDINATES TO DCD FILE AT STEP 2148000
ENERGY: 2149000     18052.3050     21410.8477      6868.9800       307.4126
   -150538.9168      4629.4826         0.0000         0.0000     52071.9941
    -47197.8948       300.6853    -46565.5396    -46551.0697       300.1125
      1143.6069       -47.5449    763614.3676      -232.5036      -233.2810
ENERGY: 2150000     17945.8022     21549.3599      6870.9434       288.9983
   -150534.9575      4506.9330         0.0000         0.0000     51973.1307
    -47399.7900       300.1144    -46768.2908    -46745.8632       299.9337
      1371.6352       140.3605    763614.3676      -113.9294      -113.8836
ENERGY: 2151000     17948.7143     21553.0049      6872.5997       300.8513
   -150241.4487      4387.0052         0.0000         0.0000     51681.8177
    -47497.4556       298.4322    -46855.6487    -46879.0623       299.4887
      1128.5691      -155.0570    763614.3676      -141.8838      -141.4656
WRITING COORDINATES TO DCD FILE AT STEP 2151000
WRITING COORDINATES TO DCD FILE AT STEP 2152000
ENERGY: 2152000     17965.3541     21281.6639      6936.9223       307.3712
   -149978.7718      4293.7936         0.0000         0.0000     51936.9174
    -47256.7492       299.9053    -46614.8149    -46633.7004       299.8791
      1044.2784      -260.6070    763614.3676      -154.9321      -155.5537
ENERGY: 2153000     18060.6980     21520.9055      6866.0695       300.7993
   -150573.9400      4459.9516         0.0000         0.0000     52007.4160
    -47358.1000       300.3124    -46725.1838    -46704.0960       299.4555
       719.8347      -233.1753    763614.3676      -176.5530      -175.8184
WRITING COORDINATES TO DCD FILE AT STEP 2153000
ENERGY: 2154000     18035.7106     21718.2261      6895.7286       316.1919
   -150470.3652      4564.1296         0.0000         0.0000     52079.3165
    -46861.0620       300.7276    -46224.6220    -46211.0634       300.4939
       884.2597       -87.9826    763614.3676      -150.3208      -150.6103
WRITING COORDINATES TO DCD FILE AT STEP 2154000
ENERGY: 2155000     18013.6477     21469.2460      6851.1778       320.4497
   -150478.9898      4837.3102         0.0000         0.0000     51923.4630
    -47063.6954       299.8276    -46421.5606    -46427.7576       300.7009
      1372.4797       -29.3345    763614.3676      -119.2887      -119.8083
WRITING COORDINATES TO DCD FILE AT STEP 2155000
WRITING COORDINATES TO DCD FILE AT STEP 2156000
ENERGY: 2156000     18001.8450     21419.8714      6936.3037       297.7033
   -149984.4667      4339.9950         0.0000         0.0000     51987.5020
    -47001.2462       300.1974    -46363.8294    -46362.7071       300.2077
      1006.2176      -177.5357    763614.3676      -238.5271      -237.5715
WRITING COORDINATES TO DCD FILE AT STEP 2157000
ENERGY: 2157000     17910.1799     21516.9479      6961.0451       293.4251
   -149824.1432      4310.4109         0.0000         0.0000     52269.4700
    -46562.6642       301.8256    -45924.2914    -45922.1478       301.1870
      1036.7141      -219.0950    763614.3676      -197.7857      -197.1263
WRITING COORDINATES TO DCD FILE AT STEP 2158000
ENERGY: 2158000     17947.1297     21579.6281      6955.3950       277.4665
   -150346.5553      4532.2800         0.0000         0.0000     52073.9913
    -46980.6646       300.6968    -46350.8408    -46320.5343       300.9598
       923.7668      -240.3544    763614.3676      -189.0914      -189.2197
ENERGY: 2159000     18192.4615     21402.9388      6931.4626       308.3835
   -150535.5131      4534.7400         0.0000         0.0000     51857.9411
    -47307.5855       299.4492    -46669.4940    -46660.0231       300.3176
       808.6854      -256.0078    763614.3676      -197.2923      -196.6459
ENERGY: 2160000     18166.5506     21589.6236      6974.0475       301.2992
   -150961.9812      4703.7496         0.0000         0.0000     51836.9603
    -47389.7503       299.3281    -46751.5715    -46758.7688       299.5144
       823.7860      -151.0411    763614.3676      -183.7636      -184.1792
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Feb 29 2012 - 15:39:03 CST