From: Hyonseok Hwang (danggi_at_northwestern.edu)
Date: Tue Sep 21 2004 - 23:39:41 CDT
Dear all,
I did a couple of test calculations for the pair interaction energies 
and forces by changing the 'pairlistdist'. The 'pairlistdist' of the 
first one is '13' and that of the second is '15'. Below is two different 
outputs.
-----------------------------------------------------------
When pairlistdist = 15
ENERGY:       1         0.0000         0.0000         0.0000 
0.0000           -190.2772        11.4117         0.0000         0.0000 
         0.0000           -178.8654         0.0000      -178.6936 
-178.6936         0.0000      4.1851       -91.6689     37705.5000 
    4.1851       -91.6689
PAIR INTERACTION: STEP: 1 VDW_FORCE:         -3.0951        19.1297 
    -4.1225 ELECT_FORCE:         -0.1429       -22.0072        -2.1688
---------------------------------------------------------------
When pairlistdist = 13
ENERGY:       1         0.0000         0.0000         0.0000 
0.0000           -190.2772        11.4117         0.0000         0.0000 
         0.0000           -178.8654         0.0000      -178.6936 
-178.6936         0.0000              4.1851       -91.6689 
37705.5000         4.1851       -91.6689
PAIR INTERACTION: STEP: 1 VDW_FORCE:         44.4982        -8.8246 
   -15.0844 ELECT_FORCE:        -66.5043        19.8897        40.5486
I just showed the first step and if you look at the forces, you will 
find that the two results are very different. I thought the pair 
interaction forces as well as pair interaction energies should not 
depend on the 'pairlistdist' if pairlistdist is longer than 'cutoff' 
dist (here cutoff  =12). If you look at the energies output, they do not 
depend on the pairlistdist, and I think that energy calculation is OK. 
In case of force calculations, however, I'm wondering what's wrong with 
the pair interaction force calculations and if this is associated with 
the 'sign bug' in the pair interaction force calculation.
One more note : If I increase the pairlistdist, the forces converges to 
some values.
Thanks a lot!
-Hyon
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Feb 29 2012 - 15:38:53 CST