From: Ben Roberts (Ben.P.Roberts_at_vcp.monash.edu.au)
Date: Mon May 31 2004 - 18:22:45 CDT
Hi all,
When trying to test NAMD on small molecules, I ran across FullDirect
electrostatics as having a very significant effect.
I had noticed a smaller error in the electrostatics in n-butane, so I
tested it on two Cl- ions which were close together in space but had no
bonding interactions connecting them.
The results I found were as follows:
FullDirect OFF: Electrostatic energy is 87.4571 kcal/mole
FullDirect ON: Electrostatic energy is 110.6879 kcal/mole
This second answer (with FullDirect ON) agrees closely with that
calculated from the TINKER package (110.6846) and with a direct
calculation (110.6635).
I note that NAMD defaults to FullDirect being OFF. This looks like it
can create a significant difference. Is this actually OK, and if so, how?
Thanks
Ben
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Benjamin P. Roberts, B.Sc.(Hons)
Ph.D. Student
Department of Medicinal Chemistry
Victorian College of Pharmacy (Monash University)
381 Royal Parade, Parkville VIC 3052, Australia
Phone +61 3 9903 9674 | Fax +61 3 9903 9582 | Mobile +61 401 784 940
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Feb 29 2012 - 15:37:39 CST