From: Vermaas, Joshua (Joshua.Vermaas_at_nrel.gov)
Date: Thu Nov 02 2017 - 17:59:45 CDT
RMSD is always relative to a reference. Your reference is frame 0 of your simulation. The RMSD of frame 0 vs itself is per definition 0. Frame 1 relative to frame 0 is probably pretty small too, since there hasn't been much time to deviate away from the initial state. Each frame will deviate relative to your reference until they all look sort of samey, since your protein isn't (hopefully) going to unfold, and will explore conformations around its folded basin. In short, the behavior you describe seems perfectly normal to me. What was the asymptotic value? Something close to the resolution of the crystal structure probably?
-Josh
On 11/02/2017 04:34 PM, Monika Madhavi wrote:
Hi Peter,
Here are my configuration parameters
#############################################################
## ADJUSTABLE PARAMETERS                                   ##
#############################################################
structure            wat_collagen.psf
coordinates        wat_collagen.pdb
set temperature    280
set outputname    col_run28010
#Continuing a job from the restart files
set inputname         eq03_res20
binCoordinates        $inputname.restart.coor
binVelocities           $inputname.restart.vel
extendedSystem     $inputname.restart.xsc
firsttimestep      0
#############################################################
## SIMULATION PARAMETERS                                   ##
#############################################################
# Input
paraTypeCharmm      on
parameters          ../setup/par_all27_prot_lipid_HYP.inp
#temperature         $temperature
# Force-Field Parameters
exclude             scaled1-4
1-4scaling          1.0
cutoff                10.0
switching           on
switchdist          8.0
pairlistdist         12.0
waterModel        tip4
# Integrator Parameters
timestep               1.0  ;# 1fs/step
rigidBonds            all  ;# needed for 2fs steps
nonbondedFreq       1
fullElectFrequency  2
stepspercycle       10
# Constant Temperature Control
langevin                 on    ;# do langevin dynamics
langevinDamping     1   ;# damping coefficient (gamma) of 1/ps
langevinTemp         $temperature
langevinHydrogen    off    ;# don't couple bath to hydrogens
# Periodic Boundary Conditions
cellBasisVector1     62.00    0.0     0.0
cellBasisVector2      0.0    62.00    0.0
cellBasisVector3      0.0     0.0    120.00
cellOrigin               0.251   0.107   0.138
wrapAll             on
# PME (for full-system periodic electrostatics)
PME                        yes
PMEGridSpacing      1.0
# Constant Pressure Control (variable volume)
useGroupPressure      yes ;# needed for rigidBonds
useFlexibleCell           no
useConstantArea        no
langevinPiston            on
langevinPistonTarget   10.1325 ;#  in bar -> 10 atm
langevinPistonPeriod  100.0
langevinPistonDecay   50.0
langevinPistonTemp    $temperature
#set contrains on CA atoms
constraints          on
consRef              restrain_ca20.pdb
consKFile           restrain_ca20.pdb
consKCol            B
# Output
outputName          $outputname
restartfreq            1    ;# 1 steps = every 0.001 ps
dcdfreq                1
xstFreq                1
outputEnergies     1
outputPressure     1
#############################################################
## EXECUTION SCRIPT                                        ##
#############################################################
run 10000000
I calculated rmsd using the example script provided in the link http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/vmd/vmd-1.7.1/ug/node185.html # Prints the RMSD of the protein atoms between each timestep
                 set num_steps [molinfo $mol get numframes]
                         # compute the transformation
 Thank you.
 Best regards,
 Monika
 On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 12:02 AM, Peter Freddolino <petefred_at_umich.edu<mailto:petefred_at_umich.edu>> wrote:
 On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 5:52 AM, Monika Madhavi <monikamadhavi_at_gmail.com<mailto:monikamadhavi_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
 I did a MD simulation of an amino acid chain in water having strong constrains applied to backbone atoms. Prior to the production run I equillibriated the system in constant temperature and pressure and used the extended system files to start the production run. When I calculated the RMSD of the backbone, I expected to see a minimal fluctuation in RMSD but I see a sudden increase in RMSD just after the simulation is started and then it follows a damped oscillatory behavior before it reaches an asymptotic value. I wonder what could be the reason for that kind of a behaviour, is it due to something wrong with my configuration parameters?
 Thank you.
 
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 
: Mon Dec 31 2018 - 23:20:40 CST
        # and the first timestep for the given molecule id (default: top)
        proc print_rmsd_through_time {{mol top}} {
                # use frame 0 for the reference
                set reference [atomselect $mol "backbone and protein" frame 0]
                # the frame being compared
                set compare [atomselect $mol "backbone and protein"]
                for {set frame 0} {$frame < $num_steps} {incr frame} {
                        # get the correct frame
                        $compare frame $frame
                        set trans_mat [measure fit $compare $reference]
                        # do the alignment
                        $compare move $trans_mat
                        # compute the RMSD
                        set rmsd [measure rmsd $compare $reference]
                        # print the RMSD
                        puts "RMSD of $frame is $rmsd"
                }
        }
You would need to provide more information, such as your config files and how you measured the rmsd, in order to get a useful response...
Best,
Peter
Dear all,
Best regards,
Monika
--
W.A.Monika Madhavi
Lecturer (Probation),
Department of Physics,
University of Colombo.
--
W.A.Monika Madhavi
Lecturer (Probation),
Department of Physics,
University of Colombo.