From: Gianluca Interlandi (gianluca_at_u.washington.edu)
Date: Mon Oct 19 2015 - 12:31:23 CDT
Thanks Norman for pointing me to the right spot in the documentation.
I have compared 10 and 20 stepspercycle and did not notice any difference
in performance. I thought that re-assigning atoms twice as frequently
should significantly affect the speed.
Gianluca
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015, Norman Geist wrote:
> No idea where you were looking, but this parameter is still fundamental for
> NAMD.
>
> http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/namd/2.10/ug/node39.html#13367
>
> Norman Geist
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: owner-namd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu [mailto:owner-namd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu] Im Auftrag
> von Gianluca Interlandi
> Gesendet: Montag, 19. Oktober 2015 03:20
> An: NAMD list <namd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu>
> Betreff: namd-l: stepspercycle
>
> Dear list,
>
> NAMD used to have an option called "stepspercycle" at least until 2.6:
>
> http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/namd/2.6/olddocs/ug/node26.html
>
> I cannot find this option any more in the newer documentation. Is it in
> order to discourage users from setting it, or can it not be set at all?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gianluca
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Gianluca Interlandi, PhD gianluca_at_u.washington.edu
> +1 (206) 685 4435
> http://artemide.bioeng.washington.edu/
>
> Research Assistant Professor at the Department of Bioengineering
> at the University of Washington, Seattle WA U.S.A.
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>
-----------------------------------------------------
Gianluca Interlandi, PhD gianluca_at_u.washington.edu
+1 (206) 685 4435
http://artemide.bioeng.washington.edu/
Research Assistant Professor at the Department of Bioengineering
at the University of Washington, Seattle WA U.S.A.
-----------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Dec 31 2015 - 23:22:08 CST