From: francesco oteri (francesco.oteri_at_gmail.com)
Date: Tue Jul 10 2012 - 03:40:42 CDT
Hi Thomas,
I dont'think there is a message when such a violation happens.
To detect this problem, namd should evaluate the distance between the atom
couples
and checking if the distance is smaller than the cutoff and the atom it is
not in the pairlist of the reference atom.
But pairlist is supposed to be used just to avoid making this calculation.
Francesco
2012/7/10 Thomas Brian <thomasbrianxlii_at_gmail.com>
> Hi namd-l,
>
> If an atom enters another atoms cutoff without being in its pairlist, what
> error/warning, if any is displayed in the output file?
>
> Also, does namd back up and redo the last "cycle" number of timesteps? (I
> saw somewhere that pairlist violations do not affect the dynamics and I
> don't know how that would be possible unless namd backed up and redid
> calculations)
> Thanks,
> Tom
>
-- Cordiali saluti, Dr.Oteri Francesco
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Tue Dec 31 2013 - 23:22:13 CST