From: Axel Kohlmeyer (akohlmey_at_cmm.chem.upenn.edu)
Date: Fri Apr 17 2009 - 15:22:04 CDT
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 21:11 +0400, DimitryASuplatov wrote:
> Hello,
hello dimitry,
> I`ve been using gromacs previously. It is generaly a default strategy in
> gmx to use dummy constructions for hydrogens or aromatics and heavy
> hydrogens constructions. This enables fast and reliable calculations
> with up to 4fs.
hmm... "constructions" sounds strange. i have not seen
this in the gromacs documentation, either.
are you talking about "constraints"?
> 1/ Is it possible to set dummy constructions in namd? How? I did not
> find anything appropriate in the manual or on the web
yes. check out the rigidBonds keyword.
the atomic mass is set in the .psf file.
> 2/ What are the general strategies to speed up the calculations in namd?
the main, hardware independent method is to use multi-timestepping
via r-RESPA. for details, please see the user's guide. the upcoming
2.7 release will also include hardware specific optimizations
(e.g. SIMD or GPU kernels for non-bonded interactions).
cheers,
axel.
> Thanks, I appreciate your time.
> SDA
-- ======================================================================= Axel Kohlmeyer akohlmey_at_cmm.chem.upenn.edu http://www.cmm.upenn.edu Center for Molecular Modeling -- University of Pennsylvania Department of Chemistry, 231 S.34th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6323 tel: 1-215-898-1582, fax: 1-215-573-6233, office-tel: 1-215-898-5425 ======================================================================= If you make something idiot-proof, the universe creates a better idiot.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Feb 29 2012 - 15:52:37 CST