Date: Wed Sep 19 2018 - 09:52:56 CDT
Thanks for your advice. I have set the firsttimestep to 0 and everything
在 2018年09月19日 22:32, Brian Radak 写道:
> I'm 90% sure these are all 32 bit integers in the code. It's also
> possible that there is not much overflow checking until a logical
> error is encountered.
> What do you specifically have to gain from running so many steps at
> once? I can't imagine such a procedure is robust on most hardware.
> Firsttimestep is also just a bookkeeping device and doesn't impact
> output beyond simple mod operations for flagging output.
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018, 9:44 PM yjcoshc <yjcoshc_at_gmail.com
> <mailto:yjcoshc_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I am trying to restart a NAMD simulation which has run for 2133000000
> steps. If I set:
> firsttimestep 2133000000
> run 1000000000
> and then NAMD would run 0 step and exit. I have looked at the NAMD
> source code and found the type of N and firsttimestep is int, not
> long or int64_t. Does that mean the maximum firsttimestep and total
> steps is the maximum int type integer (2147483647 in gcc)?
> Haochuan Chen
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Mon Dec 31 2018 - 23:21:24 CST