Re: Overflow in LJcorrection?

From: Jason Swails (
Date: Sat Dec 05 2015 - 07:54:57 CST

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Brian Radak <>

> Yes? But in a different way. Now LJAvgA and LJAvgB are extremely large and
> the correction becomes effectively infinite. I guess that means the
> overflow is in the double now?

‚ÄčIt is *very* hard to overflow a double. You need a number on the order of
10^300 to do that. Double overflow is unlikely.

Jason M. Swails
Rutgers University
Postdoctoral Researcher

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Dec 31 2015 - 23:22:17 CST