Re: Interaction energy definition

From: nan li (
Date: Fri Nov 22 2013 - 15:21:31 CST

Thank you for your reply, Aron.
As I specified Amber force field, the interaction energy between
peptide-water is derived from Amber potential, right? You mentioned
pairwise interaction energy is corresponding to solvation enthalpy. Is it
right to say if interaction energy is low (or high), then solvation
enthalpy is low (or high)?
Thank you.

2013/11/22 Aron Broom <>

> The interaction energy is the sum of all the pairwise potentials that
> would be calculated when doing MD. So for water and protein that will be
> the sum of all the pairwise VDW, and electrostatic terms between all pairs
> of water-protein atoms.
> Since that interaction energy in a vacuum would be 0, I suppose you can
> make the argument that there is some relation to the solvation enthalpy,
> but the problem is that you're ignoring any changes in protein-protein
> enthalpy that might happen as a result of being solvated.
> Anyway, the main point here is that the interaction energy is very
> precisely defined in terms of forcefield potentials, but interpreting what
> that means is something else.
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:45 PM, nan li <>wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I am using pair interaction energy calculation to get the "interaction
>> energy" between water and protein in a system. I am confusing about the
>> definition of "interaction energy". Is it the enthalpy of solvation?
>> DeltaH= Delta H{lattice energy} + Delta H {solvation}.
>> or is the "interaction energy between water and protein" the mixing
>> enthalpy DeltaH?
>> Also, if the interaction energy is for protein-ligand interaction, is the
>> interaction energy the mixing enthalpy?
>> Many thanks.
>> Nan
> --
> Aron Broom M.Sc
> PhD Student
> Department of Chemistry
> University of Waterloo

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Dec 31 2014 - 23:21:56 CST