Re: Preventing rotation of a protein

From: Giacomo Fiorin (giacomo.fiorin_at_gmail.com)
Date: Wed Jul 17 2013 - 21:31:15 CDT

Hello Thomas, the bias is only on the overall rotation, not on the internal
degrees of freedom: any force applied to the orientation colvar doesn't
have a projection along vectors that would change the internal structure of
the protein.

Giacomo

On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Thomas Albers <talbers_at_binghamton.edu>wrote:

> Hello!
>
> I have got a system with a 400 amino acid dimer that fits into a
> 128*96*96 A oblong water box. That's about 100K atoms. A cubic
> 128*128*128 water box would be about 200K atoms.
>
> If I restrain the rotation of the protein with an orientation colvar,
> as hinted at on p. 123 of the NAMD 2.9 manual there's a *substantial*
> speed penalty; IIRC it's so bad that I might as well drop the colvar
> and use a cubic box instead. However, in the recent protein-ligand
> binding tutorial (this one:
> http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Publications/Stories/plbtutorial/) the colvar
> is defined only for the backbone of the protein, this is much faster,
> but I fear I might introduce bias in the internal degrees of freedom.
>
> Does anyone on the list have some input?
>
> Regards,
> Thomas
>
>

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Dec 31 2014 - 23:21:26 CST