From: Ada Zhan (zyqfrog10_at_msn.com)
Date: Wed May 01 2013 - 15:10:03 CDT
Yes, exactly! Thanks a lot!
-Ada
Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 15:12:23 -0400
Subject: Re: namd-l: WHAM analysis for Umbrella sampling
From: broomsday_at_gmail.com
To: zyqfrog10_at_msn.com
CC: chipot_at_ks.uiuc.edu; jerome.henin_at_ibpc.fr; namd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu
assuming the order of the columns in your file is just: timestep, variable_of_interest, other stuff... then you don't need to do any extraction, just feed it the raw files.
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Ada Zhan <zyqfrog10_at_msn.com> wrote:
I have .colvars.traj files and the output frequency is high enough (every 5ps). The easiest way for me would be to extract the information from .colvars.traj directly and apply them into WHAM by Grossfield.
Chris,
Thanks for your encouragement! I would like to try to write up such kind of code for learning purpose. For now, a well established software is more straight forward and safe for me. :-)
Thanks again!
Best regards,
Ada
Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 14:09:53 -0400
Subject: Re: namd-l: WHAM analysis for Umbrella sampling
From: broomsday_at_gmail.com
CC: zyqfrog10_at_msn.com; jerome.henin_at_ibpc.fr; namd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu
Ada,
Do you not also have the .colvars.traj files?
I take Jerome's point about the discreet nature of the data, but if the frequency is far higher than the decorrelation time than it's mostly irrelevant.
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Chris Chipot <chipot_at_ks.uiuc.edu> wrote:
-- Aron Broom M.Sc PhD Student Department of Chemistry University of Waterloo -- Aron Broom M.Sc PhD Student Department of Chemistry University of Waterloo
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Dec 31 2014 - 23:21:10 CST