From: Kenno Vanommeslaeghe (kvanomme_at_rx.umaryland.edu)
Date: Tue Oct 15 2013 - 14:40:50 CDT
On 10/15/2013 01:42 PM, James Starlight wrote:
> Also I've found that Free energy perturbation and Thermodynamic
> integration could be usefull for affinity measurements.
They're the gold standard, but that comes at a cost. Be advised that FEP
and TI are often a bit less trivial to set up than other types of
calculations, and are computationally expensive. Moreover, special
precautions may need to be taken when studying a buried site. It *might*
be easier to start with something like MM/PBSA, as Aaron suggested
(provided that the buried site is handled correctly).
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Tue Dec 31 2013 - 23:23:50 CST