From: Martin, Erik W (Erik.Martin_at_stjude.org)
Date: Mon Jan 21 2013 - 01:07:11 CST
It's actually not that intuitive. I'm pretty sure the angle in question is measured from 180 (in other words 180 is 0)... But yes, probably more a VMD question
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 20, 2013, at 11:48 PM, "Norman Geist" <norman.geist_at_uni-greifswald.de<mailto:norman.geist_at_uni-greifswald.de>> wrote:
Isn’t it a VMD question?
There’s a manual about it, too. I guess the angle was measured donor-acceptor-hydrogen. So if you want 120, set 120 and see if you get the expected view.
Norman Geist.
Von: owner-namd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu<mailto:owner-namd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu> [mailto:owner-namd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu] Im Auftrag von Anurag Sharma
Gesendet: Sonntag, 20. Januar 2013 17:54
An: namd-l-digest_at_ks.uiuc.edu<mailto:namd-l-digest_at_ks.uiuc.edu>
Betreff: namd-l: H-bonds cutoff angle criterian
I have a problem in representing the HBonds. If I want to represent cutoff angle = 120 then what cutoff angle should I enter in VMD graphic representation. is it 120 or 60.
Thanks
________________________________
Email Disclaimer: www.stjude.org/emaildisclaimer
Consultation Disclaimer: www.stjude.org/consultationdisclaimer
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Tue Dec 31 2013 - 23:22:54 CST