From: Marc Gordon (marcgrdn55_at_gmail.com)
Date: Sat Sep 08 2012 - 05:21:49 CDT
HI Norman
Yes that is what I thought but I couldn't find it explicitly confirmed in
the NAMD documentation and didn't want to just assume I had it right.
Regards
Marc
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Norman Geist <norman.geist_at_uni-greifswald.de
> wrote:
> scnb = „scale non bonded“****
>
> ** **
>
> so common sense would say that a factor of 1 will not change anything to
> the incoming ff.****
>
> ** **
>
> Norman Geist.****
>
> ** **
>
> *Von:* owner-namd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu [mailto:owner-namd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu] *Im
> Auftrag von *Marc Gordon
> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 6. September 2012 14:27
> *An:* namd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu
> *Betreff:* Re: namd-l: scnb value to prevent VDWs scaling****
>
> ** **
>
> Hi all
>
>
> Didn't get a response to this and I really need an answer so I thought I
> should bump it.
>
> Please if anyone has an answer for me it would be much appreciated.
>
>
> Regards
> Marc****
>
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Marc Gordon <marcgrdn55_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:****
>
> Hi all
>
> I'm trying to find out what scnb figure in NAMD results in no scaling. I
> gather from the user guide that the default is 2 and that the VDWs
> interactions are divided by the scnb value.
>
> It seems to me that an scnb value of 1 would then be required to achieve
> no scaling (or a scaling factor of 1 anyway) of VDWs interactions. Just
> thought I would check. Am I correct in this?
>
>
> Regards
> Marc****
>
> ** **
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Tue Dec 31 2013 - 23:22:32 CST