From: Bruno Luís Pinto de Oliveira (boliveira_at_itn.pt)
Date: Mon Oct 03 2011 - 05:24:58 CDT
Dear all,
I am new to FEP and since the last months I have gotten great help from the mailing list. Thanks to all who help me...
I am posting this message because I have a new doubt about the reverse calculation to
monitor the hysteresis.
Briefly, I would like to estimate the difference in the binding energy between a Rhenium complex and the corresponding ligand (compounds are exactly the same with the exception that the ligand lacks the metallic part Re(CO)3; the Re(CO)3 vanish).
I did the foward transformation (transformation in water and protein; lambda goes from 0 to 1) and the calculated results are in good agreement with the experimental results (I used a thermodynamic cycle that someone in a previous post confirmed that is correct; I am using 16 ps of equilibration and 80 ps of colection per lambda, 32 states, ~3ns).
Then, I used the end of the foward transformation as the starting point for the reverse simulation (lambda goes from 1 to 0).
For example, the transformation of the Rhenium complex into the ligand gave -31.33 kcal/mol (forward) and 35.34 kcal/mol (backward).
>From the literature that I read I realized that the backward transformation should display more or less the same free energy change of the forward transformation but with an opposite sign. Did I understood well?
if so can I assume that the hysteresis is acceptable???
or I need to plot the DG against the lambda as examplified in the tutorial of Christophe Chipot et al.
I did it and as you can see in the graphic the foward and backward curves do not converge.
http://www.boliveira.com/NAMD.html
I am confuse because if the values of the backward and foward transformation should have opposite sign of course they will never converge.
I feel that I'm missing some step but I can not figure out what...
Excuse me the long post but all my group works with amber/TI and I dont have anyone who can help me.
Can anyone help me in all these doubts??
Any help is highly appreciated...
Thanks in advance
Bruno
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Feb 29 2012 - 15:57:48 CST