size of integration step

From: Jorgen Simonsen (jorgen589_at_gmail.com)
Date: Tue Oct 13 2009 - 10:44:47 CDT

• Next message: Axel Kohlmeyer: "Re: size of integration step"
• Previous message: namd_chcwaaa_at_yahoo.com.cn: "Re: Incorrect Atom Count in binary file"
• Next in thread: Axel Kohlmeyer: "Re: size of integration step"
• Reply: Axel Kohlmeyer: "Re: size of integration step"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi all,
I am a little puzzled - is it reasonable to do a integration step of 1.5
within using rigid bonds none - I have seen that most people using 2.0 fs
are using the rigid bond all and at 1.0 fs people use rigid bond none. The
frequency of hydrogen is 7-8 fs - so is it possible to use 1.5 without rigid
bond constraints?

Any comments and suggestions appreciated

Thanks in advance

Jorgen

• Next message: Axel Kohlmeyer: "Re: size of integration step"
• Previous message: namd_chcwaaa_at_yahoo.com.cn: "Re: Incorrect Atom Count in binary file"
• Next in thread: Axel Kohlmeyer: "Re: size of integration step"
• Reply: Axel Kohlmeyer: "Re: size of integration step"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Feb 29 2012 - 15:53:21 CST