Re: Grid Forces

From: Chris Harrison (charris5_at_gmail.com)
Date: Sat Jun 27 2009 - 09:53:55 CDT

Next message: Axel Kohlmeyer: "GPGPU Programming summer school at University of Tennessee, Aug 10-14."
Previous message: Roman Petrenko: "Re: My protein went out of the water box in SMD. Would it have a bad effect on the result?"
In reply to: gbellesia_at_chem.ucsb.edu: "Grid Forces"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

At the moment, and specifically for 2.7*b1*, you should stick to the
experimental version.

Chris

--
Chris Harrison, Ph.D.
Theoretical and Computational Biophysics Group
NIH Resource for Macromolecular Modeling and Bioinformatics
Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology
University of Illinois, 405 N. Mathews Ave., Urbana, IL 61801
char_at_ks.uiuc.edu                            Voice: 217-244-1733
http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/~char               Fax: 217-244-6078
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 3:31 PM, <gbellesia_at_chem.ucsb.edu> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Last year I had the chance to test a NAMD experimental version with
> tabulated potentials. I used it to run simulations with modified Lennard
> Jones tabulated potentials. The tables consisted of three columns:
> distance, potential and force. All was clear and simple to use.
> Is there a possibility to use such tabulated LJ-like potentials with
> version 2.7b1 or should I stick to that old NAMD experimental version ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Giovanni
>
>

Next message: Axel Kohlmeyer: "GPGPU Programming summer school at University of Tennessee, Aug 10-14."
Previous message: Roman Petrenko: "Re: My protein went out of the water box in SMD. Would it have a bad effect on the result?"
In reply to: gbellesia_at_chem.ucsb.edu: "Grid Forces"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Feb 29 2012 - 15:52:58 CST