Re: Make NAMD2.7b1 with cuda bug?

From: jani sahil (genomejani_at_gmail.com)
Date: Fri May 15 2009 - 04:23:17 CDT

Thanks a lot
 compilation was done sucessfully but when i am running namd2 i am getting
following error

FATAL ERROR: CUDA error binding to device 1 on pe 0: invalid argument
------------- Processor 0 Exiting: Called CmiAbort ------------
Reason: FATAL ERROR: CUDA error binding to device 1 on pe 0: invalid
argument

[0] Stack Traceback:
  [0] CmiAbort+0x7e [0x84b34d]
  [1] _Z8NAMD_diePKc+0x4a [0x4d3e1a]
  [2] _Z15cuda_initializePPc+0x134 [0x5d8bd4]
  [3] _Z8all_initiPPc+0x46 [0x4d9b56]
  [4] _Z11master_initiPPc+0x79 [0x4d9be9]
  [5] main+0x19 [0x4d6b89]
  [6] __libc_start_main+0xf4 [0x3ca581d974]
  [7] cos+0x1a1 [0x4d34a9]
Charm++ fatal error:
FATAL ERROR: CUDA error binding to device 1 on pe 0: invalid argument

Aborted

On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Lev Lafayette <lev_at_vpac.org> wrote:

>
> ----- "jani sahil" <genomejani_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I am getting same src/BackEnd.C:135: error: ‘idlepoll’ was not
> > declared in this scope error
> > so can you please suggest me what change you have made for successful
> > compilation.
>
> I just commented out the relevant lines as they weren't applicable to what
> we were doing. i.e.,
>
> //#ifdef NAMD_CUDA
> // if ( ! idlepoll ) {
> // NAMD_die("Please add +idlepoll to command line for proper
> performance.");
> // }
> //#endif
>
>
> --
> Lev Lafayette (03) 9925 4909, Systems Administrator, Victorian Partnership
> for Advanced Computing
> "If you are sending a reply to a message or a posting be sure you summarize
> the original at the top of the message, or include just enough text of the
> original to give a context. This will make sure readers understand when they
> start to read your response."
> RFC 1855
>
>

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Feb 29 2012 - 15:52:48 CST