From: Alessandro Cembran (cembran_at_chem.umn.edu)
Date: Fri Nov 10 2006 - 17:04:45 CST
I am running NAMD 2.6 in parallel on this machine:
It's a HP/Linux Itanium2 1.5MHz Madison with QsNetII/Elan-4 Quadrics
Right now I'm running the Linux-ia64 (Itanium) pre-compiled executable
charmrun namd2 +p16 ++nodelist job.nodelist job.conf > job.out
I compared the test of a 16 processors job on this HP machine with what
I got on a 16-processors node on an Altix machine mounting the same
Itanium 1.5GHz Madison processors. (On Altix I used the Linux-ia64-MPT
(SGI Altix) pre-compiled binary with mpirun).
While the CPU time is similar for both machines (i.e, ~0.3 sec/step),
the Wall time is significantly different: on Altix it is the same as the
CPU time (~0.3 sec/step), while on the HP cluster I get something around
0.42 sec/step. Overall, on the HP the job is ~30% slower.
The AVG LDB on altix is ~32.5, while on HP is ~37
I was wondering if anybody has some clue in this performance difference.
Is this the best that I can get because Altix is a shared-memory system
and the HP cluster instead has an intrinsic slow-down due to the
communication among nodes? Or is there any way I can improve the
performances, by tweaking some MPI variables or by recompiling the code
with specific flags?
Thanks in advance,
-- Alessandro Cembran,PhD Post Doctoral Associate Mailing Address: Univ. of Minnesota, Dept. of Chemistry G2, 139 Smith Hall 207 Pleasant St SE Minneapolis, MN 55455-0431 Office: Univ. of Minnesota, Walter Library 117 Pleasant St SE, Room 473 Phone: +1 612-624-4617 E-mail: cembran_at_chem.umn.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Feb 29 2012 - 15:44:10 CST