[cluster-l] Networking Equipment
Jim Phillips
jim at ks.uiuc.edu
Wed Mar 28 13:42:47 CDT 2007
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Nils Oberg wrote:
>
> I'm purchasing a 10-node cluster and the interconnect is going to be
> gigabit Ethernet. The plan is to purchase a 24-port unmanaged
> switch. I have a few questions regarding equipment quality:
>
> 1. Does the vendor matter, or are all 24-port unmanaged switches created equal?
If they have the same backplane bandwidth then they're probably the same
performance, but I can't guarantee that. We've used SMC switches, and
while I noticed that the unmanaged switch we bought as a replacement is
slower than the older managed switch, it doesn't affect the overall
application performance.
> 2. Are there better networking cables than others?
The ones from ECE stores were pretty good. You want something with the
nice flexible guards on the end, rather than just crimped on.
> 3. All of the nodes I'm purchasing have two gigabit Ethernet
> ports. Is there a way to bundle these ports together to get twice
> the bandwidth/half of the latency of a single port?
You'll never get lower latency. The early Beowulf projects used channel
bonding to double bandwidth, which needs a second switch and you can't
boot over the network. You could try giving each machine two addresses
and plugging it into the switch twice, then setting up routing to use
different ports for even and odd nodes.
With three 8-port switches you can do a flat network neighborhood
(http://aggregate.org/FNN/) with up to 12 nodes. I'd like to hear how
that works if you decide to try it.
-Jim
More information about the cluster-l
mailing list