Re: Regarding "lossiness" of namd on GPUs

From: Bassam Haddad (bhaddad_at_pdx.edu)
Date: Mon Oct 05 2020 - 16:30:50 CDT

Thank you both very much for the prompt response. This was my assumption,
but was looking for some verification!

Cheers,
Bassam

On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 2:27 PM Victor Kwan <vkwan8_at_uwo.ca> wrote:

> Yes. See https://www.xsede.org/documents/384387/561669/2013_XSEDE_ECC.pdf
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 5:20 PM Bassam Haddad <bhaddad_at_pdx.edu> wrote:
>
>> Hello NAMDers,
>>
>> The HPC administrator for our cluster at my university had questions for
>> me regarding some of the hardware specifications for running MD
>> simulations. I was unable to find a good answer for him with regard to the
>> "lossiness" of simulations, and the tolerance for high-accuracy GPU-RAM.
>> This was the question posed:
>>
>> - Are your processes or application "lossy," i.e. don't require strict
>> accuracy? (relates to the onboard GPU RAM requirements)
>>
>> Thank you for your time on this matter.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Bassam
>>
>

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Dec 31 2020 - 23:17:14 CST