From: Jeff Comer (jeffcomer_at_gmail.com)
Date: Sun Jan 25 2015 - 18:11:17 CST
Hi Dawid,
"Low global exclusion count!" is usually a problem with the
preparation of the system. Often it means that you've chosen the
system size incorrectly or you have some kind of clash in the system
that minimization wasn't able to work out. Maybe you have a alkyl
chain stuck inside of a phenol ring somewhere. You can try looking for
problems like this, or if that doesn't work, try rebuilding the
system.
pmeGridSpacing 1.0 means that NAMD picks the pmeGridSizes for you,
which is a good idea, but probably won't fix the problem.
Jeff
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––———————
Jeffrey Comer, PhD
Assistant Professor
Institute of Computational Comparative Medicine
Nanotechnology Innovation Center of Kansas State
Kansas State University
Office: P-213 Mosier Hall
Phone: 785-532-6311
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Dawid das <addiw7_at_googlemail.com> wrote:
> Dear NAMD experts,
>
> I was doing MD simulation on a small system and I used following parameters:
>
> Pme on
> PmeGridSizeX 48
> PmeGridSizeY 48
> PmeGridSizeZ 96
>
> switching on
> switchDist 10
> cutoff 12
> pairlistdist 14
> margin 3
>
> Everything went fine, until I made my system bigger, so I had to change PME
> grid sizes to:
>
> PmeGridSizeX 96
> PmeGridSizeY 96
> PmeGridSizeZ 244
>
> Now when I try to heat up my system I get following error at 116 K:
>
> FATAL ERROR: Low global exclusion count! (1086603 vs 1086604) System
> unstable or pairlistdist or cutoff too small.
>
> So my question is if there is any relationship between PmeGridSize and
> electrostatic parameters values in a sense that I should change the latter
> in this case?
> Or perhaps I shall not increase PmeGridSize, but PMEGridSpacing instead?
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Dawid Grabarek
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Tue Dec 27 2016 - 23:20:50 CST