From: Shyno Mathew (sm3334_at_columbia.edu)
Date: Tue Oct 15 2013 - 11:53:12 CDT
thanks again Jerome. Sorry my question was kind of hidden .
Just to be clear,
If I submit FEP calculations straight from the dual topology file, it
wasn't running. So when I submitted the short run (~ 3ns) and then did FEP
calculations it worked.
So, as mentioned before, for this short run, the system has both hydrogen
(disappearing atom) and methyl group (appearing) bonded to the carbon atom
at the same time. I wasn't sure if this part (short run with all
atoms(appearing & disappearing ) before FEP ) is correct or not?
thanks,
Shyno
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Jérôme Hénin <jerome.henin_at_ibpc.fr> wrote:
> Sorry, there was a misunderstanding. Then what you were doing seems
> correct, and I don't know why it didn't run properly.
>
> Jerome
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > thanks again for your reply. Sorry for asking more questions. Please bear
> > with me as I explain few details:
> > This is exactly what I did. The dual topology was made in the beginning
> (i
> > used non equilibrated systems to make it). Then added counterions and
> > water. After this the dual topology system was minimized and submitted
> for
> > a short run before FEP calculations. As mentioned before, for this short
> > run, the system has both hydrogen (disappearing atom) and methyl group
> > (appearing) bonded to the carbon atom at the same time during the 3 ns
> run.
> >
> > Or you meant to say the dual topology has to be made using the
> equilibrated
> > systems?
> >
> > thanks again,
> > Shyno
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Jérôme Hénin <jerome.henin_at_ibpc.fr>
> wrote:
> >
> > > In general, it is simpler to setup the complete "dual topology" system
> > > from the beginning, then add solvent and other components.
> > >
> > > Jerome
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > Hello Jerome,
> > > > Thank you very much for your reply.
> > > > Ok, so I should use the equilibrated system for lambda=0 (this is
> where I
> > > > want to start). To this I can add the appearing atoms (lambda=1) also
> > > after
> > > > the equilibration run and then create the .fep file and so on.
> > > > Initially, I was trying this approach, one difficulty I faced was
> how to
> > > > number the atoms after 99999.
> > > > For example, when I add the appearing atoms to the pdb file
> (lambda=0 )
> > > > after equilibration, the seriel numbers change. This problem arises
> from
> > > > the water molecules. Maybe another option would be just to select
> > > > everything except water (for lambda=0 after equilibration) and add
> > > > appearing atoms and then solvate the system? Is this approach
> correct?
> > > >
> > > > thanks again for your help,
> > > > Shyno
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Jérôme Hénin <jerome.henin_at_ibpc.fr>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Shyno,
> > > > >
> > > > > There seems to be something wrong with your approach. If you do an
> > > > > equilibration run prior to the FEP, you should do that at a
> > > well-defined
> > > > > lambda state, by enabling the alchemical options and setting
> lambada to
> > > > > either 0 or 1, depending on where you want to start from.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Jerome
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > Dear all,
> > > > > > I am doing FEP calculations. For my system, I am mutating more
> than 1
> > > > > > residue at the same time (all are same type of mutations). Since
> > > this is
> > > > > my
> > > > > > first time doing free energy calculations, I am trying to set up
> the
> > > > > system
> > > > > > as mentioned in the tutorial:
> > > > > > "A tutorial to set up alchemical free energy perturbation
> > > calculations in
> > > > > > NAMD"
> > > > > > As the first step, I am writing the .fep input file which
> contains
> > > all
> > > > > toms
> > > > > >
> > > > > > (appearing, disappearing and non-changing atoms). Initially, I
> was
> > > doing
> > > > > > FEP immediately after minimization. However it wasn't running.
> So I
> > > did
> > > > > a
> > > > > > short run (about 3 ns) after minimization. Then submitted FEP
> runs,
> > > this
> > > > > > worked. I would like to confirm this approach is correct.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > When I did the short run (3 ns), the system has both
> disappearing and
> > > > > > appearing atoms. For eg. the hydrogen attached to a carbon atom
> will
> > > > > > disappear and a methyl group will appear. In my system I have
> both
> > > > > hydrogen
> > > > > > and methyl atom bonded to the carbon atom at the same time during
> > > the 3
> > > > > ns
> > > > > > run. Is this approach correct?
> > > > > > Any help will be appreciated,
> > > > > > thanks,
> > > > > > Shyno
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Shyno Mathew
> > > > > > PhD student
> > > > > > Department of Chemical Engineering
> > > > > > Columbia University
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Shyno Mathew
> > > > PhD student
> > > > Department of Chemical Engineering
> > > > Columbia University
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Shyno Mathew
> > PhD student
> > Department of Chemical Engineering
> > Columbia University
> >
>
-- Shyno Mathew PhD student Department of Chemical Engineering Columbia University
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Dec 31 2014 - 23:21:46 CST