From: Norman Geist (norman.geist_at_uni-greifswald.de)
Date: Thu Nov 22 2012 - 00:43:49 CST
As a follow up, the NAMD homepage just point out what you are seeing.
<http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/vmd/plugins/namdenergy/>
http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/vmd/plugins/namdenergy/
Norman Geist.
Von: owner-namd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu [mailto:owner-namd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu] Im Auftrag
von Evgeny Bulat
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. November 2012 20:27
An: namd-l_at_ks.uiuc.edu
Betreff: namd-l: NAMDEnergy: run with XSC file or not?
Hey NAMD users,
I have a technical question regarding running NAMDEnergy to obtain
non-binding interactions between two molecules. I start VMD remotely via
command line and load up the appropriate psf and dcd files. After that, I
run a script that executes the following command for a bunch of pairs of
molecules in my system:
namdenergy -nonb -sel $sel1 $sel2 -ofile $output -tempname namd_nag1
-timemult 1 -stride 10000 -par [a bunch of param and toppar files] -pme
-extsys $xsc_file
NAMDEnergy outputs really nice and helpful energy graphs. However, when I
looked through some, I noticed that the initial binding energy is
occasionally really high, as in 60-70 kcals/mol! When I tried to figure out
why, one of the things I tried is running the above command without
specifying -extsys. That is:
namdenergy -nonb -sel $sel1 $sel2 -ofile $output -tempname namd_nag1
-timemult 1 -stride 10000 -par [a bunch of param and toppar files] -pme
Both are legit ways of running NAMDEnergy according to the manual. This
time, though, I got reasonable energies for the same pairs of molecules that
gave me really high, positive energies before. Just to clarify, the xsc file
I use is the one that preceeds the equilibration for which I'm running
NAMDEnergy.
Could anyone give me some guidance as to why specifying -extsys makes such a
big difference? Also, in light of this, which calculation should I trust
more?
Thank you!
Jack
-- Jack Bulat Dept. of Molecular and Cell Biology, Chemical Biology Graduate Program, UC Berkeley
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Tue Dec 31 2013 - 23:22:46 CST